Carrales, Francisco Rios

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 9, 2015
• Docket: WR-78,488-02
• Status: Published

Opinion

y -\8M88-oz

BY: f.c

£XPMT£ I/lfmi&MCouffroF FRAAicisco Carries CRTmmL appeals

M&710A/ Fof> LEAVE F&R A FFa/Ojaig &F F/XCTAMD• I

Conclusion oFL/hv a/v TH£ Dls/ntss/iL OF fiPPLICfl/vFs HMfAf Corpus>Punsu/fnTTo TPAP ?S> /CO,

Co/V)f A/olU> TmnCisco C/>rr#les, /}ppl'ic/wJ~pro Se And njuesFT^e 7ey/)s CouFFoFCrml/Ml Appeals V/lofte 7JF>ZUhc* DfsTHcf CouFFs £>rJer To dismiss rtpphaFFT/l/ibe/is Corpus pel, J1,07. pursuflFFTo Tex. A,/?PP, tcoc. 73. iCc), Applicant Flea AMoTion oFohjeFh^n ToTke dismissaI oF his Uhens Corpus A*JsZ >Zo/S,7Ifs /JpphatFFctiJ'/?*T~ receive nSJice oF//is ApplicFFFris clts/niss/i/ aFU7 January %1> TKe envelope luas posT7nnrFUFn.il^c> is, Vie order &F dismissal was Sijnecl' Jan 9> lo/s>ll)IS /tppJicnFFlo/isprejudiced hyTTe CourF^iuenQ~T^is ApplicnFF/7o7fce 17 days//?7er, \Pknse See iTe orfitb'TT/?7Fcliecl hene/F) ..... RECEIVED IN eouRTOF criminalappems •/, FEB 09 2013 K

In is.. fipphaiFFFiled h'is wrTHoFhake/is Corpus under The directions &F Chnpier /I HnheAs Carpus STAlule oF The TeXPS Code oF Cr//n//in/procedure, /}rT7ll63*u;/)nFi>F form''STFJFsCThe MSrTFeFMe/?s Corpus Is /iJF~//iy/flid> r pior Shall IFhe disobeyed Tor my ujasiT~oFF?r/n> jF/T SubsTfinltnlly Appe/ir ThFFfFiS issuea(by Cb/nyeleAt'/Jtfflor- ljy% MnJ The UJriF~SuFFicieFPly sJiouj '/he oljec7~d>FiTst issuance? /9rF//, oy FFTfes! "Every pro Vjs/oi re/FFnQ To We LOrTFoFhabeas Corpus Sh/ill &e aoosI TF\PorM]y ConsTrued m order TFsjiue cFFeFFTFTfce fttmedy* find prFFFCrTTe rljFlT oFjhTeperson SeeFiny P&lieFunder )/, " See. a/so /?r(, II,H ushicA Stoics. The rexjU/siTes oFlfiepeTTI~ (on, dnis ApphcAFFCopipifed wFJFTKe refu/re/neFJItF ChnpJFr F hnke/ts FWfu/e, hpplic/iFF~ConTenJsj The Juclje /n mis haters Corpus proceedinj irtTFe /9J>ovedC/luse V/o/Ffed Apl, II, 27 &F7foe habeas Corpus SJFTuTey uuhick hoidsi The person riT~oFhabeas Corpus )s SerVeaI Spri/t[ immediately obey The S/nne >Andmake\'7he rclurA requiredby /auj, upon The Copy &FT7Te original' u>iu'Servedon hurtiAnd

X, i

ThiSi Ujhelher TTe wriFhe direcTed /o hi/n or ndF' J *• Appliu\FFCGnl^Ads>FrTFe331ndDisTdcFc^utFTF fl I I fi_J r—-J— dismiss /ipphcaFFsr tun)f oF'hnhe/is Corpus under We Rules oF; AppellaTe procedure Pr7J,lVr denysdJJsApplicaFF Oh A TundameFTFI find C&nsT//FTi^fi/ilrijFr The Tex. ConsF7u//crA ArFifjzFThe FurTeenWA/ffetd/rtdir OFThe dniled F/aIFs C?nsFluTion t TuRFer, /eX.FoFAPP, Proc, /?,2 FJHTes, t, , S "A G^urF^usTTioFFbAsTi^eTTiis rule C&O To Suspend Any provision mThTe Code oFCri/ninp/ procedure-,- / //. The Judje epFlKe 33%/id Pis7ncFcx>urT~ Susp ended 7Te procedures oF Ch/iphr II habeas Corpus 7ahile by dis/nissmqTTiFAppllcAiilFwrih /I o^3 PI,OS, tl,07QJ.r(£)--j /l,0S,Jl'fcrl(dV> IhlSJFU\/t/d/l.36s See EXPPrTF Clare, 6>7,o S.uo, %d $m ?oo CJex, Crlm^PP Wl) Cff/tbeas Corpus fhoa/d nFFhe used/is A^uhsTFTTJe t^r an Appeal), ft Fndtrcf 0FTTlcTAnd C?ftdustori &FtAu) is wArrnnled //? TTis Cause. See.JjfflFV. Cullen* tn£S.u*3d6>%(7ex

3, COMCLUSION .

Ihe 33Xnd OtsTrTcFCouFFdismissing ApplicnFFs wriF oFhabens Corpus January 7) lots IS ConTrary To'Ike Supreme CouFP^FTne IdniJedS/F/es precedenls Haines V, tenner, VoH US.SI1,7% S,cl7S7H0^71)1 tjaolmj Chnley [A CiLso/i^ 3SSUS. Wj HS-i/a, 73ScTT'lTClSyjholdinj AproSe Co/np/n/FFhoujev&r ihnrTruPly pleadF/riusTFe held7Hless SWincjenl STmdard ihan Pvr/nalpleadinjs drAFT&dby lawyers And Can only he drsaitssed for A#i/ure /o STUFF/} cda/tri i F IT':Appears uheyo/?d d&uFFThiaFThe p/AiFTiFF CAn proite Ato S>eFoF AacTs m SuppoFfeF his c/aim^T/ch u/ouideaTTFe Ininn % relieFl' X& FFSlo -Sll, 7X S.cFaFSf^^a^Tmf Conley \J, Cihsert , The handwriTPes? pro Se documeFFis lo he liberally ConsTFue>dT 7hiie33l*J DisTFiFFC^urFh/ts /?dT~~ < Complied ujiTFlTie Supre/ne 0>ur/~precedeFFi See also Br&okV,STaTej l31S>ix>3d7ot> 7b5 (Tx.APP. Onlfas 1°oh) L/Because oFT))e ConsI11uiconn/aalupe oFThTs iFjulry, uoe are qeddedand boundby 7hTedecisions P9nd P&nsonmj oFlFe (dndedSTaTes Supreme /WTJ,1 iPuxman VrSTaleZFSSidjd Upl, ZS&M, tVOeXi Crini,APP,t le*z) (eye; Are requiredT^F/lquj The dedsipns And PeASbniAf 6FTJi£ dpTFFdSTaTFs Suprepie CourFon heJemI ConsTiTFTFna/ issues), fee also

Hi QctofleTorres* 913SMldFTh74(7£x. cn'm, APP, mr). 'uue decide uJnefKer ATrial' tCoufFAlusedlis disereTF/i by deder/n/a/sif ujheTFerdhe'CouFFl9cfFd FidouFrerereAce To /lay jdidiFr rules or principles^ or m oTher us&rdsi toheTTer ITTe Cour7~Atied ArhiTradIy or unreasonably," Ly/es V.FFSSo SMxdwiiSoi Ox, Crw.ApP, m3j, KThls nioFcw is in reference FoTr, cFajo,C#'~2P>d9-o?-F&j AndTFXtCrim. APA A/e>,Wl

HespecTTvi/y Suhmil/edj TF^^Cia^^F^i^dz±i) FAncisCo Chrrales ApplitnFFProSe 3'o60 FPU 3SF) Sides SenuMfinlT/X, 777o3

ieLs, lots

JaslFe oFIhe CoufT

5, J Laura Hinojosa ChlPPlicnds Edddy 1/13/2015

ViaCMRRR#: 7014-1200-0002-0936-5075

Mr. Francisco Rios Carrales ,_ TDCJ#:1618988 _/^ ,^F Stiles Unit-TDCJ /. WJ , J---^ 3060 FM 3514 , \ ^ r - Beaumont, TX77705 p . . ~Jr - -^ v. . "" RE: CR-2609-09-F(2), EX PARTE FRANCISCO CARRALES#1618988 APPLICANT

Dear Sir/Madam: , ; *r .,... *v„ > V,,- >-. - %: ? < " ^. ^V"' .- 1 "' . - "- " -„ ;- -.is Please be advised that .the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Signed SIGNED BY JUDGE MARIO RAMIREZ in the above and entitled and numbered cause was signed on 01/09/2015 by the Honorable.Mario E. Ramirez, Jr., Judge for the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. 4i it

V SINCERELY,

Laura Hinojosa District-Clerk Hidalgo County Edinburg, Texas 78540

BY: Angelica Garcia -i*-..

cc: Court's File Court of Criminal Appeals, Luis Alberto Gonzalez, STATE OF TEXAS

\X C956) 3 18-2.25

j Nilda VanHook Ricardo Confreras Adriana "Audry" Sabrina S. Oneida Lamas Stephanie Palacios Aida Villarreal I chief deputy chief of Garcia Cuerra DEPUTY DISTRICT 5UDCET & CHIEF OF APPEALS ! ADMINISTRATION ASSISTANT SENIOR CLERK SUPERVISOR PROCUREMENT I •• & PU6LIC INFORMATION CHIEF DEPUTY ACCOUNTANT OFFICER