Carradine v. Wilson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Carradine v. Wilson

61 Miss. 573

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1884

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 Miss. 573 (Carradine v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carradine v. Wilson, 61 Miss. 573 (Mich. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Each of the notes executed by the appellants was for a sum greater than the amount due for liquors. The holder could therefore apply all the unlawful considerations to one of them and recover on the other. Zundt v. Roberts, 5 Serg. & Rawle 139 ; Warren v. Chapman, 105 Mass. 87; Crookshank v. Rose, 5 C. & P. 19. Cited and approved in Cotten v. McKenzie, 57 Miss. 418. The moi’tgage was given to secure each of the notes and may be enforced for the payment of that note on which a recovery could be had at law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Each of the notes executed by the appellants was for a sum greater than the amount due for liquors. The holder could therefore apply all the unlawful considerations to one of them and recover on the other. Zundt v. Roberts, 5 Serg. & Rawle 139 ; Warren v. Chapman, 105 Mass. 87; Crookshank v. Rose, 5 C. & P. 19. Cited and approved in Cotten v. McKenzie, 57 Miss. 418. The moi’tgage was given to secure each of the notes and may be enforced for the payment of that note on which a recovery could be had at law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Miss. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carradine-v-wilson-miss-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack