Carrabis v. Brooklyn Ash Removal Co.
This text of 249 A.D. 746 (Carrabis v. Brooklyn Ash Removal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action for damages for maintaining a nuisance adjacent to plaintiffs’ property as a consequence of defendant’s filling in its property with ashes and garbage and causing quantitites of water to wash down on plaintiffs’ premises; and causing odors, soot and smoke to reach plaintiffs’ premises; likewise causing them to be infested with rats. Judgment for the [747]*747plaintiffs for $504 for the period up to the beginning of this action reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The filling-in operation engaged in by the defendant was not an unlawful act, even though it resulted in the grade of its lands becoming higher than that of the plaintiffs’ land, since that filling-in operation has not resulted in the creation of a defined watercourse or an alteration in an existing one although it causes surface waters to flow onto plaintiff’s land. (Bennett v. Cupina, 253 N. Y. 436.) This element is the chief one reflected in the assessment of damages. It may be the other elements of nuisance justify merely nominal damages, but plaintiffs should be afforded an opportunity, if they be so advised, to endeavor to prove that such other elements justify substantial damages, as to which we express no opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 746, 291 N.Y.S. 841, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrabis-v-brooklyn-ash-removal-co-nyappdiv-1936.