Carraballo v. Buhler

230 S.E.2d 878, 238 Ga. 72, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1099
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 1, 1976·No. 31648·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

This is a nonmeritorious appeal in a land line case, in which the problem arose because the Buhlers’ deed was made dependent upon Mrs. Carraballo’s deed to adjacent land, and her description contained an error. The Buhlers claimed the disputed strip through adverse possession, and the jury agreed.

Enumerations 1, 2 and 4, objecting to jury charges and failure to charge, are without merit as no. objection was raised in the trial court. Enumeration 3 is without merit because at trial the objection to this "hearsay” evidence was waived. The evidence supported the verdict, disposing of Enumeration 5.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carraballo v. Buhler, 230 S.E.2d 878, 238 Ga. 72, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1099 (Ga. 1976).

230 S.E.2d 878 (Carraballo v. Buhler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simmons v. Edge
270 S.E.2d 457 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)