Carraballo v. Buhler

Supreme Court of Georgia

Carraballo v. Buhler

230 S.E.2d 878, 238 Ga. 72, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1099

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 1, 1976

Docket31648

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 230 S.E.2d 878 (Carraballo v. Buhler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carraballo v. Buhler, 230 S.E.2d 878, 238 Ga. 72, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1099 (Ga. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

This is a nonmeritorious appeal in a land line case, in which the problem arose because the Buhlers’ deed was made dependent upon Mrs. Carraballo’s deed to adjacent land, and her description contained an error. The Buhlers claimed the disputed strip through adverse possession, and the jury agreed.

Enumerations 1, 2 and 4, objecting to jury charges and failure to charge, are without merit as no. objection was raised in the trial court. Enumeration 3 is without merit because at trial the objection to this "hearsay” evidence was waived. The evidence supported the verdict, disposing of Enumeration 5.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI