Carr v. Youngblood

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Carr v. Youngblood

113 A.2d 711

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 16, 1955·No. No. 1641·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

- Plaintiff brought this action: for the value of certain services performed. by him at defendant’s home. The-issues developed at trial were (1) whether ■ defendant authorized plaintiff to do the work, (2) whether the work was done in a workmanlike manner, and (3) whether the charges for. it were reasonable. The trial court found in plaintiff’s favor on all these factual issues, and, as there was substantial evidence to support the finding, there.is no question of law for us to review;.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

- Plaintiff brought this action: for the value of certain services performed. by him at defendant’s home. The-issues developed at trial were (1) whether ■ defendant authorized plaintiff to do the work, (2) whether the work was done in a workmanlike manner, and (3) whether the charges for. it were reasonable. The trial court found in plaintiff’s favor on all these factual issues, and, as there was substantial evidence to support the finding, there.is no question of law for us to review;.

Affirmed.

Carr v. Youngblood, 113 A.2d 711 (D.C. 1955).

Pincite

113 A.2d 711 (Carr v. Youngblood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.