Carr v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carr v. State

298 S.W.3d 118, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1279, 2009 WL 2922849

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2009·No. WD 69769·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Carr appeals the circuit court’s judgment dismissing his pleading that challenged his criminal sentence under Supreme Court Rule 29.05, and further sought to re-open his post-conviction relief proceeding under Rule 29.15 on the basis that his counsel abandoned him. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Carr appeals the circuit court’s judgment dismissing his pleading that challenged his criminal sentence under Supreme Court Rule 29.05, and further sought to re-open his post-conviction relief proceeding under Rule 29.15 on the basis that his counsel abandoned him. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Carr v. State, 298 S.W.3d 118, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1279, 2009 WL 2922849 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

298 S.W.3d 118 (Carr v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.