Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Carr v. State

Carr v. State

925 So. 2d 352, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2369, 2006 WL 398180
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carr v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 917 So. 2d 1047 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 22, 2006·No. No. 2D05-3686·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jason E. Carr appeals the summary dismissal of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, alleging four claims for relief. We affirm because Carr’s- rule 3.850 motion was untimely. Carr filed his rule 3.850 motion more than two years after his April 19, 2002, judgment and sentence became final. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b). Carr failed to allege any exceptions to the two-year time limitation provided in rule 3.850.

Affirmed.

KELLY, WALLACE, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carr v. State, 925 So. 2d 352, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2369, 2006 WL 398180 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

925 So. 2d 352 (Carr v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.