Carr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carr v. State

421 So. 2d 1098, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22123

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 20, 1982

DocketNo. 81-587

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 421 So. 2d 1098 (Carr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carr v. State, 421 So. 2d 1098, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22123 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

The trial court having concluded that its order on motion to compel was not disposi-tive of the case, the appeal is dismissed. Pursuant to the procedure suggested in Gray v. State, 379 So.2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), the trial court shall allow appellant thirty days from the date of this order within which to file a motion to withdraw her plea. The trial court shall grant such motion unless the state is able to establish prejudice as a result of the delay engendered by this appeal. Should appellant not be allowed to withdraw her plea, she may seek review of the order denying withdrawal by filing a new appeal in this court.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

The trial court having concluded that its order on motion to compel was not disposi-tive of the case, the appeal is dismissed. Pursuant to the procedure suggested in Gray v. State, 379 So.2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), the trial court shall allow appellant thirty days from the date of this order within which to file a motion to withdraw her plea. The trial court shall grant such motion unless the state is able to establish prejudice as a result of the delay engendered by this appeal. Should appellant not be allowed to withdraw her plea, she may seek review of the order denying withdrawal by filing a new appeal in this court.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 So. 2d 1098, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack