Carr v. Stackhouse

206 A.D. 628
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment in the judgment creditor’s action unanimously affirmed, with costs. Judgment in the injunction action unanimously affirmed, without costs. We are satisfied that the finding of fact that defendant Frances S. Carr contributed no moneys toward the purchase of the property is justified by the evidence. This, therefore, disposes of the proposition-that there was a moral obligation on the part of the defendant Stackhouse to convey to said defendant Carr. As to the question of actual intent to defraud, we are of opinion that a finding to the contrary of that made at the Special Term would be unwarranted by the proof. Present — Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carr v. Stackhouse, 206 A.D. 628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

206 A.D. 628 (Carr v. Stackhouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aarons v. Rosenberg
138 Misc. 66 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)