Carr v. Sciandra

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carr v. Sciandra

281 A.D. 1072, 122 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4365

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D. 1072 (Carr v. Sciandra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carr v. Sciandra, 281 A.D. 1072, 122 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Appeal from order dismissed. Memorandum: Under the circumstances disclosed in this record defendant’s automobile at the time of the accident was being operated by D. Brigante within the purview of section 59 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. (See Arcara v. Moresse, 258 N. Y. 211.) Whether or not it was being so operated with defendant’s permission, express or implied, is a question of fact which should have been submitted to the jury. (See Piwowdrski v. Cornwell, 273 N. Y. 226.) All concur. (Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint as to defendant Carmen Sciandra, in an automobile negligence action. The order severed the action against plaintiff by defendant Szrama.) Present — Taylor, ,P. J.,, McCurn, Vaughan,, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Appeal from order dismissed. Memorandum: Under the circumstances disclosed in this record defendant’s automobile at the time of the accident was being operated by D. Brigante within the purview of section 59 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. (See Arcara v. Moresse, 258 N. Y. 211.) Whether or not it was being so operated with defendant’s permission, express or implied, is a question of fact which should have been submitted to the jury. (See Piwowdrski v. Cornwell, 273 N. Y. 226.) All concur. (Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint as to defendant Carmen Sciandra, in an automobile negligence action. The order severed the action against plaintiff by defendant Szrama.) Present — Taylor, ,P. J.,, McCurn, Vaughan,, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 1072, 122 N.Y.S.2d 132, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-sciandra-nyappdiv-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack