Carr v. Richardson

1 Hill & Den. 372
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1841
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Hill & Den. 372 (Carr v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carr v. Richardson, 1 Hill & Den. 372 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).

Opinion

By the Court, Bronson, J.

The plaintiff cannot split up the action in this way. The first rule of May term, 1840, only applies to casés where it appears that the whole action is on one or more written instruments or records.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Hill & Den. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-richardson-nysupct-1841.