Carr v. Radkey

384 S.W.2d 736, 1964 Tex. App. LEXIS 2399
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 18, 1964
DocketNo. 11238
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 384 S.W.2d 736 (Carr v. Radkey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carr v. Radkey, 384 S.W.2d 736, 1964 Tex. App. LEXIS 2399 (Tex. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinions

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This is a will contest participated in by the Attorney General by virtue of Article 4412a, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St

The will is a holographic one and the jury, in response to issues, found that the will was wholly in the handwriting of the testatrix, but that the testatrix did not have testamentary capacity when the will was executed on December 28, 1936.

By the terms of the will bequests were made to the University of Texas for scholarships, effective at the date of the death of the third generation of the testatrix’s nieces and nephews. The Attorney General is prosecuting this appeal by virtue of the statute.

The will is as follows:

[738]*738APPENDIX B

TYPEWRITTEN COPY OF HOLOGRAPHIC WILL OF DECEMBER 28, 1936, OF HATTIE W. HEWLETT.

[739]*739

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carr v. Radkey
393 S.W.2d 806 (Texas Supreme Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
384 S.W.2d 736, 1964 Tex. App. LEXIS 2399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-radkey-texapp-1964.