Carr v. Radkey

384 S.W.2d 736, 1964 Tex. App. LEXIS 2399
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 18, 1964·No. No. 11238·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This is a will contest participated in by the Attorney General by virtue of Article 4412a, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St

The will is a holographic one and the jury, in response to issues, found that the will was wholly in the handwriting of the testatrix, but that the testatrix did not have testamentary capacity when the will was executed on December 28, 1936.

By the terms of the will bequests were made to the University of Texas for scholarships, effective at the date of the death of the third generation of the testatrix’s nieces and nephews. The Attorney General is prosecuting this appeal by virtue of the statute.

The will is as follows:

[738] APPENDIX B

TYPEWRITTEN COPY OF HOLOGRAPHIC WILL OF DECEMBER 28, 1936, OF HATTIE W. HEWLETT.

[739]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carr v. Radkey, 384 S.W.2d 736, 1964 Tex. App. LEXIS 2399 (Tex. Ct. App. 1964).

384 S.W.2d 736 (Carr v. Radkey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carr v. Radkey
393 S.W.2d 806 (Texas Supreme Court, 1965)