Carr v. Quigley

21 P. 607, 79 Cal. 130, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 683
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMay 1, 1889
DocketNo. 9531
StatusPublished

This text of 21 P. 607 (Carr v. Quigley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carr v. Quigley, 21 P. 607, 79 Cal. 130, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 683 (Cal. 1889).

Opinions

Thornton, J.

We regard the contention of appellant, Carr, in this case as settled by the decision of the supreme court of the United States in Doolan v. Carr, 125 U. S. 618, and by the decisions of this court made prior to the judgment in Doolan v. Carr, viz., Carr v. Quigley, 57 Cal. 394, and McLaughlin v. Heid, 63 Cal. 208.)

[132]*132The same points were presented in Doolan v. Carr that are presented in this case, and with reference to the same Mexican grant of Las Pocitas. The only difference is, that in Doolan v. Carr the points arose and were presented on an offer of testimony, and here they arise on the proof of the facts, which Doolan offered to prove in his suit against Carr.

In our judgment, there is no error in the record, and the judgment and order must be affirmed.

So ordered.

Sharpstein, J., McFarland, J., and Works, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newhall v. Sanger
92 U.S. 761 (Supreme Court, 1876)
Doolan v. Carr
125 U.S. 618 (Supreme Court, 1887)
United States v. McLaughlin
127 U.S. 428 (Supreme Court, 1888)
Carr v. Quigley
57 Cal. 394 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
McLaughlin v. Heid
63 Cal. 208 (California Supreme Court, 1883)
Byrne v. Alas
16 P. 523 (California Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 P. 607, 79 Cal. 130, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-quigley-cal-1889.