Carr v. PURSCELL

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carr v. PURSCELL

284 S.W.3d 772, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 789, 2009 WL 1586027

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 9, 2009

DocketWD 69725

StatusPublished

This text of 284 S.W.3d 772 (Carr v. PURSCELL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carr v. PURSCELL, 284 S.W.3d 772, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 789, 2009 WL 1586027 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Purscell appeals from a judgment entered against him in the Circuit Court of Pettis County in an action filed *773 by Tim and Amy Carr stemming from an automobile collision involving Purscell and the Carrs. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Purscell appeals from a judgment entered against him in the Circuit Court of Pettis County in an action filed *773 by Tim and Amy Carr stemming from an automobile collision involving Purscell and the Carrs. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 S.W.3d 772, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 789, 2009 WL 1586027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-purscell-moctapp-2009.