Carr v. New York State Division of Parole Appeals Unit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carr v. New York State Division of Parole Appeals Unit

251 A.D.2d 880, 673 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7415

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D.2d 880 (Carr v. New York State Division of Parole Appeals Unit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carr v. New York State Division of Parole Appeals Unit, 251 A.D.2d 880, 673 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7415 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Donohue, J.), entered November 21,. 1997 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the State Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since petitioner has reappeared before the State Board of Parole and has been released on parole, this appeal is moot and should, therefore, be dismissed (see, Matter of Herrera v New York State Bd. of Parole, 246 AD2d 703; Matter of Figueroa v Le Fevre, 90 AD2d 625). Petitioner’s assertion that this matter presents an exception to the mootness doctrine has been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Donohue, J.), entered November 21,. 1997 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the State Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since petitioner has reappeared before the State Board of Parole and has been released on parole, this appeal is moot and should, therefore, be dismissed (see, Matter of Herrera v New York State Bd. of Parole, 246 AD2d 703; Matter of Figueroa v Le Fevre, 90 AD2d 625). Petitioner’s assertion that this matter presents an exception to the mootness doctrine has been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 880, 673 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-new-york-state-division-of-parole-appeals-unit-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack