Carr v. New York State Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carr v. New York State Board of Elections

49 A.D.2d 955, 375 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11249

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 955 (Carr v. New York State Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carr v. New York State Board of Elections, 49 A.D.2d 955, 375 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to validate certificates of nomination designating Raymond L. Wilkes, Douglas F. Young and Paul J. Widlitz as candidates of the Liberal Party in the general election to be held on November 4, 1975 for the public office of Justice of the Supreme Court, Tenth Judicial District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 23, 1975, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs (Election Law, §330; cf. Matter of Bates v Beyer, 36 AD2d 735). We note that upon the oral argument of this appeal the question of proper venue was specifically withdrawn. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to validate certificates of nomination designating Raymond L. Wilkes, Douglas F. Young and Paul J. Widlitz as candidates of the Liberal Party in the general election to be held on November 4, 1975 for the public office of Justice of the Supreme Court, Tenth Judicial District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 23, 1975, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs (Election Law, §330; cf. Matter of Bates v Beyer, 36 AD2d 735). We note that upon the oral argument of this appeal the question of proper venue was specifically withdrawn. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 955, 375 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-new-york-state-board-of-elections-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack