Carr v. Mehta
540 A.2d 1086, 14 Conn. App. 808, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 181
This text of 540 A.2d 1086 (Carr v. Mehta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carr v. Mehta, 540 A.2d 1086, 14 Conn. App. 808, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 181 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
This appeal is an attempt by the defendant to have this court retry the facts found by the trial court. We will not. The defendant also claims that the trial court’s orders are impermissibly vague. We do not agree. Furthermore, any claimed ambiguity could have been clarified for the defendant by the seeking of articulation from the trial court.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Roy v. Stephen Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc.
543 A.2d 775 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
540 A.2d 1086, 14 Conn. App. 808, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-mehta-connappct-1988.