Carr v. Leonard
This text of Carr v. Leonard (Carr v. Leonard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
CLARENCE CARR and Case No. 1:24-cv-01681-CL SHAKIRA CARR, ORDER Plaintiffs,
v.
REBECCA LEONARD, et al,
Defendants. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued a Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 16, and the matter is now before this Court on Plaintiffs’ objections, ECF No. 18. The review is de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). Having carefully reviewed the record and Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds no error and concludes the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 16, is adopted in full. Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, ECF No. 14, is dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 15th day of January, 2025.
____s/Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
1 – ORDER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carr v. Leonard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-leonard-ord-2025.