Carr v. Leonard

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided January 15, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-01681·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

CLARENCE CARR and Case No. 1:24-cv-01681-CL SHAKIRA CARR, ORDER Plaintiffs,

v.

REBECCA LEONARD, et al,

Defendants. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued a Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 16, and the matter is now before this Court on Plaintiffs’ objections, ECF No. 18. The review is de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). Having carefully reviewed the record and Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds no error and concludes the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 16, is adopted in full. Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, ECF No. 14, is dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 15th day of January, 2025.

____s/Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge

1 – ORDER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carr v. Leonard, (D. Or. 2025).

Carr v. Leonard (Carr v. Leonard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related