Carr v. Johns
This text of Carr v. Johns (Carr v. Johns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7735
LENT CHRISTOPHER CARR, II,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
TRACY W. JOHNS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-hc-02153-H)
Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 3, 2008
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lent Christopher Carr, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lent Christopher Carr, II, a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Carr v. Johns, No. 5:07-hc-02153-H (E.D.N.C.
Nov. 8, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carr v. Johns, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-johns-ca4-2008.