Carr v. H.O.P.E. Community Service, Inc.
This text of 430 F. App'x 228 (Carr v. H.O.P.E. Community Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Inetha Michelle Carr appeals the district court’s order granting her motion to proceed in forma pauperis and summarily dismissing her complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carr v. H.O.P.E. Community Serv., No. 3:11-cv-00159-JRS (E.D.Va. Mar. 24, 2011). We deny Carr’s motions for a formal hearing and for a transcript at Government’s expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
430 F. App'x 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-hope-community-service-inc-ca4-2011.