Carr v. Hilton

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Carr v. Hilton

28 Misc. 782, 59 N.Y.S. 1100

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Misc. 782 (Carr v. Hilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carr v. Hilton, 28 Misc. 782, 59 N.Y.S. 1100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Leventritt, J.

This judgment must be affirmed. The record presents no question of law, and on the sole question of fact litigated — whether the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s father was the real party in interest — the justice found against the defendants. Ho injustice has been done, and following our settled practice, we shall not disturb his finding.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Freedman, P. J., and MacLean, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leventritt, J.

This judgment must be affirmed. The record presents no question of law, and on the sole question of fact litigated — whether the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s father was the real party in interest — the justice found against the defendants. Ho injustice has been done, and following our settled practice, we shall not disturb his finding.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Freedman, P. J., and MacLean, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Misc. 782, 59 N.Y.S. 1100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-hilton-nyappterm-1899.