Carr v. Hendrix

129 S.E. 876, 34 Ga. App. 446, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 303
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 6, 1925
Docket16555
StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 876 (Carr v. Hendrix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carr v. Hendrix, 129 S.E. 876, 34 Ga. App. 446, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 303 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Bloodwortii, J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers.

2. The charge given the jury was authorized by the facts, covered substantially the issues raised in the case, and there was no error therein either of commission or omission which would require the grant of a new trial. If fuller instructions on any particular branch of the case [447]*447were desired, request therefor should have been made as is provided by section 6084 of the Civil Code of 1910.

Decided October 6, 1925. PL. E. Coates, Latvson & Ware, for plaintiff in error. Marion Turner, contra.

3. There is evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 876, 34 Ga. App. 446, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-hendrix-gactapp-1925.