Carr v. Head
This text of Carr v. Head (Carr v. Head) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6280
DAVID HAROLD CARR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. R. HEAD, Lieutenant; OFFICER WILSON; BRADSHAW, Officer,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOHN T. MCDEVITT, Sheriff; BOBBY LEE ENGLISH; DAVID PEARSON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00180-GCM)
Submitted: October 31, 2008 Decided: November 19, 2008
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Harold Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Francis Perrin, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David Harold Carr appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Carr v. Head, No. 1:07-cv-00180-GCM (W.D.N.C. Feb. 1,
2008). We deny Carr’s motion for appointment of counsel and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carr v. Head, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-head-ca4-2008.