Carr v. Haruye Suzuki
45 F.2d 1013, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3109
Opinion
The pertinent facts of this ease are staled in the opinion of Judge James, reported in 36 F. (2d) 424.
[1014]*1014The law applicable to the' facts was correctly applied by the court below as construed by this court in Shizuko Kumanomido v. Nagle, 40 F.(2d) 42.
Offer affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carr v. Haruye Suzuki, 45 F.2d 1013, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3109 (9th Cir. 1931).
45 F.2d 1013 (Carr v. Haruye Suzuki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shizuko Kumanomido v. Nagle
40 F.2d 42 (Ninth Circuit, 1930)