Carr v. Haruye Suzuki
45 F.2d 1013, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3109
This text of 45 F.2d 1013 (Carr v. Haruye Suzuki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carr v. Haruye Suzuki, 45 F.2d 1013, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3109 (9th Cir. 1931).
Opinion
The pertinent facts of this ease are staled in the opinion of Judge James, reported in 36 F. (2d) 424.
[1014]*1014The law applicable to the' facts was correctly applied by the court below as construed by this court in Shizuko Kumanomido v. Nagle, 40 F.(2d) 42.
Offer affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shizuko Kumanomido v. Nagle
40 F.2d 42 (Ninth Circuit, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
45 F.2d 1013, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-haruye-suzuki-ca9-1931.