Carr v. Hagerich

13 A.2d 494, 125 N.J.L. 2, 1940 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 131
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 27, 1940·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bodine, J.

There was error in the failure of the court to grant a non-suit or direct a verdict for the defendant. The liability of the owner or occupier of land to his. invitees is circumscribed by his invitation. Ryerson v. Bathgate, 67 N. J. L. 337; Guse v. Martin, 96 Id. 262; Carey v. Gray, 98 Id. 217; Gavin v. O'Connor, 99 Id. 162; Liveright v. Max Lifsitz Furniture Co., 117 Id. 243; Wright v. General Ceramics Co., 120 Id. 33.

There was no implied invitation to enter this tavern by a dark service entrance clearly marked with the words “Keep Out.” Hence, there was no duty owing to the plaintiffs save to refrain from causing willful injury.

The judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carr v. Hagerich, 13 A.2d 494, 125 N.J.L. 2, 1940 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 131 (N.J. 1940).

13 A.2d 494 (Carr v. Hagerich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanson v. Lehigh Valley R.
120 F.2d 498 (Third Circuit, 1941)