Carr v. H. B. Baldwin

64 S.W.2d 1116
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 18, 1933
DocketNo. 9325.
StatusPublished

This text of 64 S.W.2d 1116 (Carr v. H. B. Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carr v. H. B. Baldwin, 64 S.W.2d 1116 (Tex. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant herein sued to enjoin the appellees from selling real estate under the power of sale stipulated in a certain deed of trust.

Appellant based his petition upon the provisions of the so-called Moratorium Law, *1117 which is House Bill No. 231 (c. 102), passed by the Regular Session of the 43d Legislature (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2218b).

This court has very recently decided, in the case of Malachy Murphy v. E. O. Phillips et al., 63 S.W.(2d) 404, that House Bill No. 231, is unconstitutional and void, wherein it attempts to stay trustee sales of real estate provided for in deeds of trust.

For the reasons therein stated, we are of the opinion that the trial judge properly refused the injunction herein prayed for by appellant.

The temporary injunction heretofore granted by this court will be, in all things, dissolved.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. Phillips
63 S.W.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 S.W.2d 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-h-b-baldwin-texapp-1933.