Carr v. Gray

573 So. 2d 874, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9086, 1990 WL 191998
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 4, 1990
DocketNo. 90-2194
StatusPublished

This text of 573 So. 2d 874 (Carr v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carr v. Gray, 573 So. 2d 874, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9086, 1990 WL 191998 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Attorney Joy Carr petitions for a writ of common law certiorari seeking review of an order denying her motion for protective order and motion to quash a subpoena duc-es tecum in a guardianship proceeding. The underlying proceeding in which this discovery was sought is the subject of a companion Petition for Writ of Common Law Certiorari, Case Nos. 90-1425 and 90-2281.

We deny the petition without prejudice for petitioner to reassert the points raised in her petition should the need arise later in the guardianship proceedings.

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
573 So. 2d 874, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9086, 1990 WL 191998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-gray-fladistctapp-1990.