Carr v. Glass-Tech Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carr v. Glass-Tech Corp.

614 So. 2d 1227, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3642, 1993 WL 90555

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 30, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1556

StatusPublished

This text of 614 So. 2d 1227 (Carr v. Glass-Tech Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carr v. Glass-Tech Corp., 614 So. 2d 1227, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3642, 1993 WL 90555 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

[1228]*1228ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellee’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our original opinion, and issue the following opinion in its stead.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for relief from a final default judgment. Appellant failed to show the existence of a meritorious defense and a legal excuse for failure to comply with the rules. See Cunningham v. White, 390 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Further, we find that appellant properly received service of process in person under section 48.031, Florida Statutes (1991).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI