Carr v. Doran
This text of Carr v. Doran (Carr v. Doran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EUGENE DIVISION
CLARENCE CARR, Case No. 1:24-cv-1591-CL
Plaintiff, ORDER
v.
ERICKA DORAN, et al,
Defendants. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued a Findings and Recommendation on April 29, 2025. F&R, ECF No. 31. The matter is now before the Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Neither party filed objections. The Court reviews de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). Having carefully considered the Findings and Recommendation and record, the Court finds no error and concludes that the Report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 31, is ADOPTED in full. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, ECF Nos. 18 and 20, are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Motion to Recuse, ECF Nos. 17 and 30, are DENIED. Plaintiff’s Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, Plaintiff is directed to heed the guidance offered in the Findings and
1 - Order Recommendation, including that the state law tort claims and any claims asserted against Defendants Benjamin Lull and Kelly Hagar are to be omitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 14th day of July 2025. ___s/Michael J. McShane_______________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
2 - Order
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carr v. Doran, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-doran-ord-2025.