Carr v. D'Elia

72 A.D.2d 769, 421 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14007
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 72 A.D.2d 769 (Carr v. D'Elia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carr v. D'Elia, 72 A.D.2d 769, 421 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State commissioner, dated June 22, 1978 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency to discontinue petitioner’s grant of public assistance for 30 days, and thereafter until compliance with certain regulations of the Department of Social Services is exhibited (18 NYCRR 385.7 [b]). Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner failed to produce any evidence at the fair hearing to sustain her assertion that her failure to fulfill her work requirement was excusable on the ground of illness, other than her own testimony that illness prevented her from fulfilling her requirement, and a letter from her work supervisor that she was often absent from work, claiming to be ill. Her own testimony constitutes a "primary source” of information as defined by 18 NYCRR 351.5 (a) but as such, it was required to be verified (see, also, 18 NYCRR [770]*770385.6 [c] [9]). The letter from her work supervisor is not proper verification that petitioner was unable to work due to illness; such verification should have taken the form of medical evidence. Petitioner’s failure to produce such verification rendered her own testimony insufficient to sustain her burden of proving illness (18 NYCRR 385.6 [c] [9]). O’Connor, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trapano v. Blum
89 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
McKeon v. Brezenoff
89 A.D.2d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Hansen v. D'Elia
88 A.D.2d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Jackson v. D'Elia
86 A.D.2d 669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Woods v. Fahey
84 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Leonard v. Kirby
84 A.D.2d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Floyd v. D'Elia
83 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Herman v. Blum
78 A.D.2d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Ball v. Beaudoin
103 Misc. 2d 1000 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Stewart v. Chase Manhattan Bank
74 A.D.2d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A.D.2d 769, 421 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-delia-nyappdiv-1979.