Carr v. City of New York

257 A.D. 849, 12 N.Y.S.2d 407, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8155
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carr v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 252 A.D. 880

Opinion

Action for damages for personal [850]*850injuries sustained when plaintiff slipped on an accumulation of oil and grease on a roadway, at a point other than at a crosswalk, in the borough of Richmond. Judgment for the plaintiff reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. The accumulation of oil and grease to the extent of one-half inch or less, on a public highway, as indicated by plaintiff’s Exhibits 2 and 3, at a point other than at a crosswalk, due to drippings from buses, did not constitute a condition of actionable negligence on the part of the appellant. (O’Reilly v. City of Syracuse, 49 App. Div. 538; Osborne v. Village of North Tarrytown, 180 id. 224; Hagenv. Village of Montgomery, 268 N. Y. 709; Greater New York Charter, § 383, second subd. 1.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carr v. City of New York, 257 A.D. 849, 12 N.Y.S.2d 407, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8155 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

257 A.D. 849 (Carr v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hagen v. Village of Montgomery
198 N.E. 569 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
O'Reilly v. City of Syracuse
49 A.D. 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)