Carr v. Burgess

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Carr v. Burgess

623 A.2d 1384, 264 N.J. Super. 10, 1993 N.J. Super. LEXIS 140

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedApril 5, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 623 A.2d 1384 (Carr v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carr v. Burgess, 623 A.2d 1384, 264 N.J. Super. 10, 1993 N.J. Super. LEXIS 140 (N.J. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Epstein in his opinion reported at 264 N.J.Super. 191, 623 A.2d 1384 (Ch.Div.1993). We are satisfied that the findings of fact are supported by substantial [11]*11credible evidence in the record and find no sound reason or justification to interfere with them. See Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Epstein in his opinion reported at 264 N.J.Super. 191, 623 A.2d 1384 (Ch.Div.1993). We are satisfied that the findings of fact are supported by substantial [11]*11credible evidence in the record and find no sound reason or justification to interfere with them. See Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

623 A.2d 1384, 264 N.J. Super. 10, 1993 N.J. Super. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-burgess-njsuperctappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack