Carr v. Benedict, Hale & Co.

48 Ga. 431
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 48 Ga. 431 (Carr v. Benedict, Hale & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carr v. Benedict, Hale & Co., 48 Ga. 431 (Ga. 1873).

Opinion

Warner, Chief Justice.

Benedict, Plall & Company, judgment creditors of Foster Blodgett, garnisheed Joseph P. Carr, Esq., an attorney at law, who answered that he had in his hands $564 55 belonging to the defendant; the Court ordered the money in the hands of the garnishee to be paid into Court, to be disposed of as the Court might-thereafter direct. At a subsequent day, when the motion to dispose of the money came' on to lie heard, there were sundry executions, in favor of different plaintiffs, against the defendant, Blodgett, before the Court, claiming the money. The garnishee stated in his place to the Court that before the summons of garnishment was served on him, that he had decided to appropriate the money in his hands to the payment of judg[321]*321ments against the defendant in favor of Picquet, Bigelow and Emmerson, but had not actually done so, because he was waiting the consent to or refusal of such appropriation by the defendant. The Court ordered the money in Court to be paid *to the oldest execution before it, after paying to-the execution in favor of Benedict, ITall & Company, the diligent creditors bringing the money into Court, the sum of $185 39, the same being the amount of fees and costs in obtaining said judgment. Whereupon, exceptions were filed to the decision of the Court. We find no error in the judgment distributing the money paid into Court by the garnishee, under its order, on the statements of facts disclosed in the record.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Lenderman
172 S.E.2d 478 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Tressler v. Lunt
158 A. 709 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1932)
Herndon v. Braddy
146 S.E. 495 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Snell v. Snell
142 S.E. 96 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Ga. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-benedict-hale-co-ga-1873.