Carr v. 165 Street Inc.

291 A.D.2d 472, 738 N.Y.S.2d 218

This text of 291 A.D.2d 472 (Carr v. 165 Street Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carr v. 165 Street Inc., 291 A.D.2d 472, 738 N.Y.S.2d 218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—In related actions, inter alia, to foreclose a mortgage (Action No. 2), and tó set aside a foreclosure sale (Action No. 1), the defendant in Action No. 1 appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rings County (Douglass, J.), dated July 27, 2001, which, inter alia, directed the register of deeds to vacate the referee’s deed recorded April 25, 2001 (App Div Docket No. 2001-07635), and the plaintiff in Action No. 2 appeals, by permission, from an order of the same court, dated July 31, 2001, which, sua sponte, determined that the amount due to satisfy the mortgage was $205,365, and that, upon payment of that amount, the mortgage would be deemed satisfied (App Div Docket No. 2001-07366).

Ordered that the order dated July 27, 2001, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated July 31, 2001, is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which determined that the amount due to satisfy the mortgage was $205,365 and substituting a provision therefor that the amount due is $208,240; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[473]*473By order dated July 31, 2001, the Supreme Court improperly failed to award per diem interest of $51.66 for the period from October 26, 2000, until December 19, 2000, and improperly listed the principal amount of the mortgage as $147,664, instead of the correct principal amount, $147,644.

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
291 A.D.2d 472, 738 N.Y.S.2d 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-165-street-inc-nyappdiv-2002.