Carr Quality Jewelers, Inc. v. Coker
This text of 201 So. 2d 798 (Carr Quality Jewelers, Inc. v. Coker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendants (appellants) appeal from a final judgment entered pursuant to a non-jury trial in favor of the plaintiffs (appel-lees) involving a suit for attorney’s fees arising from an attorney-client contract.
The primary thrust of defendants’ appeal deals with the correctness of the lower court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in construing the contract.
It is a well established rule of law that the trial court’s findings of fact and ■conclusions of law come to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Pokress v. Josephart, Fla.App. 1963, 152 So.2d 756; Bittner v. Walsh, Fla. App.1961, 132 So.2d 799; Clausi v. Casner Motors, Fla.App. 1959, 112 So.2d 587.
The court having had the benefit ■of oral argument and having considered the same, carefully examined and considered the record on appeal, the briefs and the points raised, finds that there is competent substantial evidence to support the findings of fact and the conclusions of law of the trial judge and that the appellants have failed to overcome the presumption of correctness of the trial court’s findings.
Accordingly, the final judgment appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 So. 2d 798, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-quality-jewelers-inc-v-coker-fladistctapp-1967.