Carpio Guerra v. Holder
This text of 320 F. App'x 735 (Carpio Guerra v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Martha Elena Carpió Guerra, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying her motion to reopen proceedings to renew her application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Ordonez v. INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Carpió Guerra’s untimely motion to reopen because she failed to submit material evidence of changed country conditions in Guatemala. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F. App'x 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpio-guerra-v-holder-ca9-2009.