Carpet Center at Korvette-Westbury v. New York Post Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carpet Center at Korvette-Westbury v. New York Post Corp.

13 A.D.2d 532, 213 N.Y.S.2d 166, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12007

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1961

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 A.D.2d 532 (Carpet Center at Korvette-Westbury v. New York Post Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carpet Center at Korvette-Westbury v. New York Post Corp., 13 A.D.2d 532, 213 N.Y.S.2d 166, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In a libel action to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the defendant A. B. C. Carpet Company’s publication of an advertisement by the defendant-appellant in a newspaper published by the New York Post Corporation, said defendant Carpet Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 22, 1969, which denied its motion, made pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted with leave to plaintiff, if it be so advised, to serve an amended complaint within 20 days after entry of the order hereon. The plaintiff is a limited partnership and, in our opinion, in any action of this character it is subject to the same rules which apply to a corporation and to an unincorporated association (Kirkman v. Westchester Newspapers, 287 N. Y. 373; Stone v. Textile Examiners & Shrinkers Employers’ Ass'n, 137 App. Div. 655). It does not appear on the face of the complaint that the subject publication directly affected the credit of the plaintiff or caused it to suffer pecuniary injury, or that said publication was so defamatory that it must be inferred that it accomplished such result. No special damage is alleged. In our opinion, under these circumstances, the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Brown v. O’Reilly, 10 A D 2d 731; Samson United Corp. v. Dover Mfg. Co., 233 App. Div. 155; Hornell Broadcasting Corp. v. Nielsen Co., 8 A D 2d 60, 63, affd. 8 N Y 2d 767). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a libel action to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the defendant A. B. C. Carpet Company’s publication of an advertisement by the defendant-appellant in a newspaper published by the New York Post Corporation, said defendant Carpet Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 22, 1969, which denied its motion, made pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted with leave to plaintiff, if it be so advised, to serve an amended complaint within 20 days after entry of the order hereon. The plaintiff is a limited partnership and, in our opinion, in any action of this character it is subject to the same rules which apply to a corporation and to an unincorporated association (Kirkman v. Westchester Newspapers, 287 N. Y. 373; Stone v. Textile Examiners & Shrinkers Employers’ Ass'n, 137 App. Div. 655). It does not appear on the face of the complaint that the subject publication directly affected the credit of the plaintiff or caused it to suffer pecuniary injury, or that said publication was so defamatory that it must be inferred that it accomplished such result. No special damage is alleged. In our opinion, under these circumstances, the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Brown v. O’Reilly, 10 A D 2d 731; Samson United Corp. v. Dover Mfg. Co., 233 App. Div. 155; Hornell Broadcasting Corp. v. Nielsen Co., 8 A D 2d 60, 63, affd. 8 N Y 2d 767). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 532, 213 N.Y.S.2d 166, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpet-center-at-korvette-westbury-v-new-york-post-corp-nyappdiv-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack