Carpentier v. Bartlett

62 Cal. 561, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 563
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 1, 1881
DocketNo. 7,849
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cal. 561 (Carpentier v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carpentier v. Bartlett, 62 Cal. 561, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 563 (Cal. 1881).

Opinion

The Court:

The motion to dismiss the appeal in this case must be denied. The Clerk’s certificate does not show that any notice of appeal had been served. On the contrary, he does certify that “ notice of appeal was never served, as appears from the files.” The respondent attempts to supply the omission by an affidavit of service of said notice. But that can not be received in lieu of the Clerk’s certificate, which the rule of this Court requires. (See Frederick v. Tierney, 54 Cal. 583.)

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frederick v. Tierney
54 Cal. 583 (California Supreme Court, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Cal. 561, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpentier-v-bartlett-cal-1881.