Carpenters District Council v. Stewart

171 So. 2d 367
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 8, 1965
DocketNos. 33307, 33293
StatusPublished

This text of 171 So. 2d 367 (Carpenters District Council v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carpenters District Council v. Stewart, 171 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on petitions and cross-petition for writ of certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission in said cause, bearing date [368]*368January 9, 1964, and the petitioners and cross-petitioner having failed to show that the essential requirements of law have been violated, it is ordered that the said petitions be and the same are hereby denied. See Harbor Island Spa v. Barlow, Fla. 1962, 139 So.2d 879; Victor Wine & Liquor, Inc. v. Beasley, Fla.1962, 141 So.2d 581.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur. THOMAS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Victor Wine & Liquor, Inc. v. Beasley
141 So. 2d 581 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Harbor Island Spa v. Barlow
139 So. 2d 879 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 So. 2d 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenters-district-council-v-stewart-fla-1965.