Carpenter v. Woody
This text of Carpenter v. Woody (Carpenter v. Woody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7725
CLAUDE CARPENTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
C.T. WOODY, Sheriff; BURNETT, Lt. Col.; ROBINSON, Capt., Medical Dept.; DR. FURMAN; RICHMOND SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00143-RLW)
Submitted: March 31, 2009 Decided: April 14, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claude Carpenter, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, Thomas Douglas Lane, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Claude Carpenter appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Carpenter v. Woody, No. 3:08-cv-00143-
RLW (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carpenter v. Woody, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-woody-ca4-2009.