Carpenter v. Williams

Supreme Court

Carpenter v. Williams

76 U.S. 785, 19 L. Ed. 827, 9 Wall. 785, 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1032

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 30, 1870

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 76 U.S. 785 (Carpenter v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carpenter v. Williams, 76 U.S. 785, 19 L. Ed. 827, 9 Wall. 785, 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1032 (1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice MILLER

delivered the opinion of the court. We are of opinion that the record presents no case for the jurisdiction of this court. The case turns solely on the pei’sonal identity of the individual to whom the recorder confirmed, or intended to confirm, the lot in question. It involves the construction of no act of Congress. The decision of the court below denies the validity of no act under the authority of the United States. It recognizes to its fullest extent the title, confirmed by the act of Congress and the act of confirmation, and only determines to whom that confirmation was made.

It is a mistake to suppose that every suit for real estate, in which the parties claiming under the Federal government are at issue as to which of them is entitled to the benefit of that title, necessarily'raises a question of Federal cognizance.

If this were so, the title to all the vast domain, once vested in the United States, could be brought from the State courts to this tribunal.

In the case before us, the rules which must determine the question at issue are common law rules, and the result cannot be varied by the application of any principle of Federal law or Federal authority. *

Writ dismissed.

*

Ryan v. Thomas, 4 Wallace, 604.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice MILLER

delivered the opinion of the court. We are of opinion that the record presents no case for the jurisdiction of this court. The case turns solely on the pei’sonal identity of the individual to whom the recorder confirmed, or intended to confirm, the lot in question. It involves the construction of no act of Congress. The decision of the court below denies the validity of no act under the authority of the United States. It recognizes to its fullest extent the title, confirmed by the act of Congress and the act of confirmation, and only determines to whom that confirmation was made.

It is a mistake to suppose that every suit for real estate, in which the parties claiming under the Federal government are at issue as to which of them is entitled to the benefit of that title, necessarily'raises a question of Federal cognizance.

If this were so, the title to all the vast domain, once vested in the United States, could be brought from the State courts to this tribunal.

In the case before us, the rules which must determine the question at issue are common law rules, and the result cannot be varied by the application of any principle of Federal law or Federal authority. *

Writ dismissed.

*

Ryan v. Thomas, 4 Wallace, 604.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 U.S. 785, 19 L. Ed. 827, 9 Wall. 785, 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-williams-scotus-1870.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack