Carpenter v. Williams

386 So. 2d 1095, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 4219
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 30, 1980
DocketNo. 7909
StatusPublished

This text of 386 So. 2d 1095 (Carpenter v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carpenter v. Williams, 386 So. 2d 1095, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 4219 (La. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

MOTION TO DISMISS

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

This matter is before us at this time on a motion to dismiss the appeal taken by plain[1096]*1096tiff from a judgment rendered below sustaining defendants’ declinatory exception of venue and transferring plaintiff’s suit to the Fifteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Lafayette.

On January 4, 1980, plaintiff, James Carpenter, filed suit against defendants, Donald Lee Williams and Joe Renda Sue Williams, seeking specific performance of a contract to sell a certain home and lot in Calcasieu Parish.

In response to the suit, defendants, residents of Lafayette Parish, filed a declinato-ry exception contending • that the Fourteenth Judicial District Court in Calcasieu Parish was not a court of proper venue.

Following a hearing on the exception, the trial judge rendered judgment maintaining the declinatory exception of venue and transferring the proceedings to the Fifteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Lafayette. Plaintiff perfected an appeal from this ruling. In response to plaintiff’s appeal, defendant filed the instant motion to dismiss.

C.C.P. art. 2083 provides:

“An appeal may be taken from a final judgment rendered in causes in which appeals are given by law whether rendered after hearing or by default, and from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury.”

In Ford, Bacon & Davis Construction Company v. Doga, 365 So.2d 1143, (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1978) this court stated:

“A judgment which sustains an exception to venue is an interlocutory judgment which may not be appealed without a showing of irreparable injury. Hobbs v. Fireman's Fund American Ins. Cos., 293 So.2d 608 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1974), writ den. 296 So.2d 832; Broussard v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 204 So.2d 714 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1967); Thibaut v. Thibaut, 346 So.2d 809 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1977). LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2083.”

In the present action, appellant has not shown that he will suffer any irreparable harm as a result of the court’s ruling sustaining the declinatory exception of venue. Having failed to show any irreparable harm, plaintiff’s appeal from the interlocutory order must be dismissed at his costs. The appellees’ motion to dismiss is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Broussard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
204 So. 2d 714 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1968)
Thibaut v. Thibaut
346 So. 2d 809 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1977)
Hobbs v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Cos.
293 So. 2d 608 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1974)
Hobbs v. Fireman's Fund American Ins. Cos.
296 So. 2d 832 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1974)
Ford, Bacon & Davis Construction Co. v. Doga
365 So. 2d 1143 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 So. 2d 1095, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 4219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-williams-lactapp-1980.