Carpenter v. United Ohio Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Carpenter v. United Ohio Ins. Co.

2001 Ohio 174, 92 Ohio St. 3d 213

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 5, 2001

Docket2000-2241

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 174 (Carpenter v. United Ohio Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carpenter v. United Ohio Ins. Co., 2001 Ohio 174, 92 Ohio St. 3d 213 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 213.]

CARPENTER, APPELLANT, v. UNITED OHIO INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE, ET AL.

[Cite as Carpenter v. United Ohio Ins. Co., 2001-Ohio-174.] Insurance—Motor vehicles—Mandatory offering of uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage—Amount available for payment for purpose of setoff— Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth and Clark v. Scarpelli. (No. 00-2241—Submitted May 16, 2001—Decided July 5, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Noble County, No. 272. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., concurs in judgment. __________________ Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., and Todd O. Rosenberg, for appellant. Williams & Petro Co., L.L.C., John P. Petro and Steven E. Herman, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 213.]

CARPENTER, APPELLANT, v. UNITED OHIO INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE, ET AL.

[Cite as Carpenter v. United Ohio Ins. Co., 2001-Ohio-174.] Insurance—Motor vehicles—Mandatory offering of uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage—Amount available for payment for purpose of setoff— Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth and Clark v. Scarpelli. (No. 00-2241—Submitted May 16, 2001—Decided July 5, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Noble County, No. 272. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., concurs in judgment. __________________ Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., and Todd O. Rosenberg, for appellant. Williams & Petro Co., L.L.C., John P. Petro and Steven E. Herman, for appellee. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 174, 92 Ohio St. 3d 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-united-ohio-ins-co-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack