Carpenter v. Turn Key Health Clinics LLC
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA GRANT CARPENTER, as Special ) Administrator of the Estate of NIELSEN ) CONNER, deceased, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-763-SLP ) TURN KEY HEALTH CLINICS, LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants ) ORDER Before the Court are Motions to Dismiss [Doc. Nos. 18 and 19] filed by Defendants Garza and Meraz. Subsequent to the filing of Defendants’ Motions, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 22]. “The [A]mended [C]omplaint, as the operative complaint, supersedes the original complaint’s allegations[.]” May v. Segovia, 929 F.3d 1223, 1229 (10th Cir. 2019). Thus, those allegations are of “no legal effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss [Doc. Nos. 18 and 19] are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of September, 2025.
SCOTT L. PALK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carpenter v. Turn Key Health Clinics LLC (Carpenter v. Turn Key Health Clinics LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.