Carpenter v. Swinerton-McClure-Vinnell

Ninth Circuit

Carpenter v. Swinerton-McClure-Vinnell

150 F.2d 404, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2784

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 18, 1945

DocketNo. 10839

StatusPublished

This text of 150 F.2d 404 (Carpenter v. Swinerton-McClure-Vinnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carpenter v. Swinerton-McClure-Vinnell, 150 F.2d 404, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2784 (9th Cir. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the transcript of record, briefs filed by respective parties, and oral arguments, it is ordered that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be affirmed in all respects except as to the last three months of Edward P. Johnson’s employment, and as to said last three months’ employment the said judgment be reversed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue as proved in Rule 28.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the transcript of record, briefs filed by respective parties, and oral arguments, it is ordered that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be affirmed in all respects except as to the last three months of Edward P. Johnson’s employment, and as to said last three months’ employment the said judgment be reversed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue as proved in Rule 28.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 F.2d 404, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-swinerton-mcclure-vinnell-ca9-1945.