Carpenter v. Swinerton-McClure-Vinnell

Ninth Circuit

Carpenter v. Swinerton-McClure-Vinnell

150 F.2d 404, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2784

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 18, 1945·No. No. 10839·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the transcript of record, briefs filed by respective parties, and oral arguments, it is ordered that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be affirmed in all respects except as to the last three months of Edward P. Johnson’s employment, and as to said last three months’ employment the said judgment be reversed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue as proved in Rule 28.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the transcript of record, briefs filed by respective parties, and oral arguments, it is ordered that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be affirmed in all respects except as to the last three months of Edward P. Johnson’s employment, and as to said last three months’ employment the said judgment be reversed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue as proved in Rule 28.

Carpenter v. Swinerton-McClure-Vinnell, 150 F.2d 404, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2784 (9th Cir. 1945).

Pincite

150 F.2d 404 (Carpenter v. Swinerton-McClure-Vinnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.