Carpenter v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Carpenter v. State

141 S.E. 83, 37 Ga. App. 609, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 525

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 7, 1928

Docket18598

StatusPublished

This text of 141 S.E. 83 (Carpenter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carpenter v. State, 141 S.E. 83, 37 Ga. App. 609, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 525 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The date of the judge’s certificate to the bill of exceptions will be presumed to be the date on which it was tendered to him, where it does not affirmatively appear from the bill of exceptions or [610]*610from the certificate thereto that it was tendered on a different date. The judgment complained of was rendered on October 7, and the bill of exceptions was certified on November 2. It thus appears that the bill of exceptions was not tendered to the judge within twenty days from the date of the judgment complained of, and the writ of error is

Decided January 7, 1928. II. A. Woodward, Paul T. Chance, for plaintiff in error. W. Inman Curry, solicitor, contra.

Dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., eonom-.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The date of the judge’s certificate to the bill of exceptions will be presumed to be the date on which it was tendered to him, where it does not affirmatively appear from the bill of exceptions or [610]*610from the certificate thereto that it was tendered on a different date. The judgment complained of was rendered on October 7, and the bill of exceptions was certified on November 2. It thus appears that the bill of exceptions was not tendered to the judge within twenty days from the date of the judgment complained of, and the writ of error is

Decided January 7, 1928. II. A. Woodward, Paul T. Chance, for plaintiff in error. W. Inman Curry, solicitor, contra.

Dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., eonom-.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 S.E. 83, 37 Ga. App. 609, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-state-gactapp-1928.