Carpenter v. State

870 So. 2d 955, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5657, 2004 WL 875108
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 26, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-3393
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 870 So. 2d 955 (Carpenter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carpenter v. State, 870 So. 2d 955, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5657, 2004 WL 875108 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his postconvic[956]*956tion motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the trial court failed to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the appellant’s claim, we reverse.

The appellant was convicted of several offenses, the most severe being DUI manslaughter, a second-degree felony punishable by up to fifteen years of imprisonment. §§ 316.193(3)(c)3., 775.082(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1995). The trial court imposed 189.4 months of incarceration followed by ten years of probation, resulting in a cumulative sentence of 309.4 months, a sentence well in excess of the statutory maximum. The appellant filed the instant motion alleging his sentence is illegal in that it exceeds both the statutory maximum and the maximum sentence reflected on his 1994 guidelines scoresheet. The trial court denied the appellant’s claim, attaching a 1995 guidelines scoresheet, which reflected a maximum permissible sentence of 315.7 months.

Our review of the record reveals that the appellant is entitled to relief. Because his current offense was committed on May 6, 1996, the 1994, rather than the 1995, guidelines scoresheet controls his sentence. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000); Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000). Thus, it appears that the appellant has raised a facially sufficient claim for relief.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s claim and remand for the trial court to either grant relief or attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the appellant’s claim.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BARFIELD, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carpenter v. State
917 So. 2d 962 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
870 So. 2d 955, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5657, 2004 WL 875108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.