Carpenter v. State
This text of 459 So. 2d 1179 (Carpenter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant’s untimely appeal of the trial court’s order which summarily denied his RCrP 3.850 motion is dismissed. However, our dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief by habeas corpus pursuant to Baggett v. Wainwright, 229 So.2d 239 (Fla.1969).
Prior to seeking delayed appellate review, we urge appellant to carefully consider whether the trial court’s order is error. Appellant, of course, has a right to an appeal if he can show that through State action he was deprived of timely appealing the trial court’s order. However, an appeal would be a needless expense to the taxpayers if there was no error in the trial court’s denial of appellant’s RCrP 3.850 motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
459 So. 2d 1179, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2578, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.