Carpenter v. Southern Railway Co.
This text of 37 S.E. 186 (Carpenter v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A writ of certiorari not sued out in forma pauperis is void, if the same issue before the applicant has given the bond prescribed by section 4639 of the Civil Code. Wingard v. Southern Railway Company, 109 Ga. 177.
2. The pendency of such a proceeding does not suspend the statute of limitations which requires the bringing of a certiorari within thirty days, nor-authorize a renewal of the proceeding within six months. O’Keefe v. Cotton, 102 Ga. 516, and cases cited; Hamilton v. Phenix Ins. Co., 111 Ga. 875.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 S.E. 186, 112 Ga. 152, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-southern-railway-co-ga-1900.