Carpenter v. Shinseki
This text of Carpenter v. Shinseki (Carpenter v. Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-7018
KENNETH M. CARPENTER,
Claimant-Appellant,
v.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,
Respondent-Appellee.
Zachary M. Stolz, Chisholm, Chisholm & Kilpatrick, of Washington, DC, argued for claimant-appellant.
Jane W. Vanneman, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. With her on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were Michael J. Timinski, Deputy Assistant General Counsel and Jamie L. Mueller, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.
Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Judge William A. Moorman NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-7018
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
in CASE NO(S). 01-1882
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (NEWMAN, MAYER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED November 13, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carpenter v. Shinseki, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-shinseki-cafc-2009.